Should Diuretics Be Continued After Vestibular Nerve Section
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2016 Aug; 77(4): 341–349.
Fully Endoscopic Retrosigmoid Vestibular Nerve Section for Refractory Meniere Disease
Pradeep Setty
1Section of Neurosurgery, St. John Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, Michigan State University, Novi, Michigan, United States
Seilesh Babu
2Department of Neurotology, Michigan Ear Institute, St. John Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, Novi, Michigan, United States
Michael J. LaRouere
2Department of Neurotology, Michigan Ear Institute, St. John Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, Novi, Michigan, United States
Daniel R. Pieper
3Department of Neurosurgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Received 2015 Oct 20; Accepted 2015 Oct 26.
Abstract
Objective
This study aims to report our results and technical details of fully endoscopic retrosigmoid vestibular nerve section.
Design
A prospective observational study was conducted.
Setting
A single academic, tertiary institution involving neurosurgery and neurotology.
Participants
Previously diagnosed patients with Meniere disease, refractory to medical therapy, who underwent fully endoscopic vestibular nerve section.
Main Outcome Measures
Postoperative improvement in vertiginous symptoms as well as hearing preservation, based on the American Association of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgeons score and the Gardener and Robertson-Modified Hearing Classification. Facial nerve preservation based on the House–Brackman (HB) score.
Results
Symptoms improved or resolved in 38 of 41 (92.2%) patients with only 1 of 41 (2.4%) reporting worsening symptoms. All 41 patients (100%) had a postoperative HB score of 1/6, demonstrating full facial nerve preservation. Hearing was stable or improved in 34 of 41 (82.9%) patients. Three complications took place for a rate of 7.3%, one cerebrospinal fluid leak, and two wound infections.
Conclusion
The fully endoscopic approach to vestibular nerve sections is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of medically refractory Meniere disease. This technique also utilizes smaller incisions, minimal cranial openings, and no cerebellar retraction with improved visualization of the cerebellopontine angle neurovascular structures.
Keywords: cerebellopontine angle, endoscopy, Meniere disease, skull base
Introduction
Meniere disease is a chronic inner ear disorder that is characterized by intermittent episodes of vertigo, tinnitus, aural pressure, and sensorineural hearing loss.1 2 3 4 5 Although, currently there is no existing definitive cure, several treatment modalities are available. First-line therapy consists of medication and lifestyle modifications, while second-line therapies include various surgical techniques such as endolymphatic sac surgery, intratympanic steroids, and intratympanic gentamicin.6 7 In the rare instance in which Meniere disease remains refractory to these treatments, surgical intervention in the form of labyrinthectomy8 and vestibular nerve section has demonstrated safe and efficacious results in improving vertiginous symptoms, with the later procedure providing hearing preservation when performed in the retrosigmoid approach.1 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Vestibular nerve section traditionally involves a retrosigmoid craniotomy followed by a microscopic approach to the cranial nerve (CN) VII/VIII complex in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). The vestibular nerve would then be carefully dissected from the cochlear and facial nerves before being sharply sectioned. The procedure is typically performed in a microsurgical fashion utilizing an operative microscope for visualization. This technique, however, has several drawbacks. The linear nature of the microscopic light source, originating outside of the surgical field, does not allow the surgeon to visualize the facial nerve before vestibular nerve sectioning due to the ventral location of CN VII to CN VIII, creating the risk for significant morbidity. In addition, this approach requires cerebellar retraction, significant soft tissue dissection, and cranial defects, all of which increase potential morbidity.
In recent years, several authors have introduced the surgical endoscope to the CPA and demonstrated superior visualization of the neurovascular structures.16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 The endoscope allows the light source to be introduced into the operative field, closer to site of interest. Additionally, angled endoscopes permit visualization of structures ventral to pathology, allowing surgeons to identify the facial nerve and study its relationship to the vestibular nerve before sectioning. As a result, the endoscopic-assisted vestibular nerve section (VNS) procedure was developed with successful results,24 however, this technique continued to utilize the operative microscope for the majority of the procedure, employing the endoscope only as an adjunct.
More recently, the fully endoscopic VNS has been developed, which does not require the operative microscope at any point. As a result, surgeons are provided with improved visualization, while eliminating all cerebellar retraction, minimizing soft tissue dissection and reducing the size of the craniotomy.25 Despite its potential, the fully endoscopic VNS procedure has scarcely been reported. We present our results of the fully endoscopic VNS technique in patients with refractory Meniere disease in what is, to our knowledge, the largest reported series to date.
Methods
A prospective observational study was performed on 41 consecutive patients who underwent fully endoscopic vestibular nerve section for unilateral Meniere disease between 2005 and 2012 at our institution. All patients had clinically diagnosed Meniere disease that was uncontrolled with medical therapy. In addition, several patients had also undergone endolymphatic sac decompression without symptom improvement. Surgery was performed to section the ipsilateral vestibular nerve in a fully endoscopic manner, as described in detail in the following section. Both pre- and postoperative audiometric testing was performed in addition to neurological examinations that included thorough cranial nerve testing. Hearing was graded with both the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgeons hearing classification system26 (AAO-HNS) as well as the Gardner–Robertson scale (GR).27 Facial nerve function was evaluated via the House–Brackman scoring system (HB).
Perioperative data, including mean operative time, estimated blood loss and hospital length of stay were recorded. Additionally, operative complications such as cranial nerve palsies, wound infection, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks are reported. Follow-up was a minimum of 1 year and patients were asked if their symptoms were resolved, improved, stable, or worsened from previous surgery. Finally, patient demographics such as age, gender, and side of symptoms are reported.
Technical Consideration
Operative Setup
Patients are placed under general anesthesia and undergo endotracheal intubation. They are then positioned supine with the head elevated approximately 30 degrees, to allow for maximal venous outflow, and rotated contralaterally. This positioning creates a natural operative corridor to the CPA, allowing gravity to assist in pulling the cerebellum away from the petrous temporal bone. It is essential that the head be fixated in pins as the need for neuromonitoring prevents the use of paralytics. As a result, movement of the head during surgery could potentially cause the endoscope, which is rigidly fixated with a holding arm, to impale the brainstem or damage surrounding structures. Once the patient is appropriately positioned, attention is turned to equipment setup. A polyaxial, pneumatic, holding arm is attached to the contralateral side of the operating table and arched over the head of the patient, minimizing potential obstruction for the surgeon. A high-definition (HD) monitor is then placed on the patient's contralateral side, giving the surgeon a direct line-of-sight during the operation. Fig. 1 illustrates appropriate patient positioning and Fig. 2 demonstrates the ideal operating room setup, maximizing space for surgeon while allowing easy visualization of the monitors. Finally, attention is then placed on localizing the incision site. A small amount of hair over the ipsilateral mastoid is clipped to approximately two to three fingerbreadths behind the ear. The transverse sinus is approximated by marking a line from the ipsilateral zygomatic root to the external occipital protuberance, while creating a line parallel and lateral to the posterior mastoid groove localizes the sigmoid sinus. The intersection of these lines represents the approximate location of the transverse-sigmoid (TS) junction. The incision is then marked with a 2 to 3 cm linear line that is parallel, but posterior, to the hairline, transecting the TS junction, as demonstrated in Fig. 3. Electrodes are then placed for cranial nerve VII monitoring as well as brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Maximal cerebellar relaxation is obtained by infusing 1 to 2 g/kg mannitol, 20 mg furosemide, and lowering the Paco 2 to 28 mm Hg.
Preoperative patient positioning with the head elevated and rotated to the contralateral side. The polyaxial, multijointed, pneumatic holding arm is attached to the contralateral side of the bed and a HD monitor is also on the contralateral side of the patient. HD, high-definition.
View of the operating room setup. The pneumatic arm arches over the patient's head and rigidly holds the endoscope in place, allowing the surgeon to operate with bimanual dexterity. The HD monitor is strategically placed to allow the surgeon to easily view the screen while operating. HD, high-definition
A line is drawn from the root of the zygoma to the external occipital protuberance, estimating the transverse sinus. Another line is drawn just posterior to the mastoid groove, estimating the sigmoid sinus. The intersection of these two lines approximates the TS junction, an important landmark in this procedure. TS, transverse-sigmoid.
Operative Detail
A small, 2 cm, linear incision is made over the previously marked site. Monopolar cautery is used for soft tissue dissection, with bone wax utilized to obtain hemostasis from bleeding emissary veins. The asterion and the occipitomastoid suture should be located and exposed. A high-speed drill is then used to create a 14-mm craniectomy inferior to asterion and one-third anterior, two-thirds posterior to the occipitomastoid suture until the TS junction is exposed (Fig. 4). Drilling should start in the posteroinferior corner and performed in a superolateral fashion to avoid injury to the sinuses. Once the TS junction is appropriately skeletonized, the dura is opened sharply in a curvilinear fashion, adjacent to the TS junction, allowing for the dural flap to be reflected in a posteromedial direction. A 4 mm 0-degree endoscope is then cannulated along the junction of the petrous temporal bone and tentorium. Continuous suctioning of CSF allows for further relaxation of the cerebellum, thereby enlarging the operative corridor in the CPA. As the corridor grows from CSF egress, the endoscope is slowly advanced until the petrosal vein is encountered. We routinely cauterize and cut the petrosal vein, creating an unobstructed view of the CN VII/VII complex. At this point, the 0-degree endoscope can be exchanged for the 30-degree endoscope which allows the surgeon to visualize ventral to CN VIII, locating the precise location of CN VII and nervus intermedius along with their relationship to CN VIII. The 30-degree endoscope is then exchanged back to the 0-degree endoscope for the remainder of the operation. Once the endoscope is appropriately positioned, a cleavage plane is found and developed, separating the vestibular and cochlear nerves. Once adequate separation has been obtained, the vestibular nerve is sharply sectioned with extreme care to avoid damage to the nearby CN VII (Fig. 5). The use of stimulating instruments also assists in identification of the facial nerve. After adequate sectioning, meticulous hemostasis is obtained and the endoscope is removed. The dura is closed in a watertight fashion, bone cement is used to fill the craniectomy defect, and the skin is closed in layers with absorbable suture.
A 14-mm craniectomy is performed, skeletonizing the TS junction in the superolateral corner of the cranial defect. A US quarter is placed in the field for size reference. TS, transverse-sigmoid; US, ultrasound.
(A) Intraoperative endoscopic view of CN VIII demonstrating the cleavage plane between the vestibular and cochlear nerves. (B) CN V is visible in the background. (C) The vestibular nerve has been carefully dissected and separated from the cochlear nerve. (D) The vestibular nerve being sectioned. The vestibular nerve has been fully sectioned, while the cochlear nerve remains intact. CN VII is slightly visible ventral to the CN VIII complex. CN, cranial nerve.
Results
Among the 41 patients, 15 were males (36.5%) and 26 were females (63.5%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 50.1 years with a range of 22 to 81 years. The side of surgery was nearly evenly split with 21 patients (51%) undergoing surgery on the right side while 20 patients (49%) underwent left-sided surgery. Resolution or improvement of symptoms was seen in 38 of 41 patients (92.7%), with 23 patients (56.1%) stating complete resolution and 15 patients (36.6%) reporting improvement. Only one patient (2.4%) reported worsened symptoms after surgery, while two patients (4.9%) stated that they had no change.
Pre- and postoperative clinical data are listed in Tables 1 to 2 3 4 5. All 41 patients maintained intact facial nerve function, HB 1/6, postoperatively. In addition, 34 patients (82.9%) were found to have stable or improved hearing on postoperative audiometric testing, scored on both the AAO-HNS and GR scales. Among this group, 31 patients (75.6%) had stable hearing, while 3 patients (7.3%) were found to have improved hearing. Seven patients (17.0%) were found to have worsened hearing after surgery; however, five of these patients did maintain "serviceable" hearing based upon the two hearing scales.
Table 1
Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma classification system (AAO-HNS grade)
| Class | PTA (dB) | WRS (%) |
|---|---|---|
| A | ≤ 30 | > 70 |
| B | > 30, ≤ 50 | ≥ 50 |
| C | > 50 | ≥ 50 |
| D | Any level | < 50 |
Table 2
Gardner–Robertson-modified hearing classification
| Class | Description | PTA (dB) | WRS (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | Good to excellent | 0–30 | 70–100 |
| II | Serviceable | 31–50 | 50–69 |
| III | Nonserviceable | 51–90 | 5–49 |
| IV | Poor | 91–maximum | 1–4 |
| V | None | Not testable | 0 |
Table 3
Patient characteristics
| Total patients | 41 |
| Age (y) | |
| Mean | 50.1 |
| Range | 22–81 |
| Gender | |
| Male | 15 (37%) |
| Female | 26 (63%) |
| Side of symptoms | |
| Right | 21 (51%) |
| Left | 20 (49%) |
Table 4
Patient data
| Patient | Symptoms | Complication | Preop AC PTA (dB) | Preop WRS (%) | Preop AAO-HNS grade | Preop GR class | Postop AC PTA (dB) | Postop WRS (%) | Postop AAO-HNS grade | Postop GR class | Preop House–Brackman score | Postop House–Brackman score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Resolved | None | 25 | 84 | A | I | 30 | 80 | A | 1 | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 2 | Resolved | None | 5 | 96 | A | I | 5 | 96 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 3 | Improved | None | 40 | 82 | B | II | 50 | 72 | B | II | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 4 | Improved | None | 30 | 88 | A | I | 30 | 84 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 5 | Improved | None | 10 | 96 | A | I | 15 | 92 | A | I | 1/6 | 3/6 |
| 6 | Resolved | None | 50 | 60 | B | II | 50 | 92 | B | II | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 7 | Resolved | None | 25 | 88 | A | I | 20 | 92 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 8 | Improved | None | 60 | 60 | C | III | 75 | 72 | C | III | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 9 | Resolved | None | 5 | 100 | A | I | 5 | 100 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 10 | Improved | None | 20 | 96 | A | I | 20 | 96 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 11 | Resolved | None | 5 | 100 | A | I | 5 | 100 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 12 | Resolved | None | 40 | 96 | B | II | 25 | 96 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 13 | Improved | None | 10 | 72 | A | I | 10 | 72 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 14 | Resolved | None | 10 | 100 | A | I | 5 | 96 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 15 | Improved | None | 35 | 84 | B | II | 75 | 8 | D | IV | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 16 | Resolved | Infection | 50 | 96 | B | II | 70 | 64 | C | III | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 17 | Improved | None | 60 | 72 | C | III | 65 | 72 | C | III | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 18 | Resolved | None | 25 | 100 | A | I | 25 | 100 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 19 | Resolved | None | 50 | 96 | B | II | 50 | 88 | B | II | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 20 | Improved | None | 10 | 92 | A | I | 10 | 92 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 21 | No change | None | 55 | 76 | C | III | 50 | 96 | B | II | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 22 | No change | CSF Leak | 20 | 96 | A | I | 15 | 96 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 23 | Resolved | None | 30 | 90 | A | I | 30 | 90 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 24 | Resolved | None | 55 | 92 | C | III | 50 | 90 | B | II | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 25 | Resolved | None | 65 | 72 | C | III | 60 | 64 | C | III | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 26 | Resolved | None | 5 | 100 | A | I | 25 | 96 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 27 | Resolved | Infection | 30 | 100 | A | I | 40 | 100 | B | II | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 28 | Resolved | None | 15 | 100 | A | I | 20 | 100 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 29 | Resolved | None | 5 | 96 | A | I | 5 | 96 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 30 | Improved | None | 25 | 100 | A | I | 60 | 84 | C | III | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 31 | Improved | None | 30 | 84 | B | I | 50 | 64 | B | II | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 32 | Improved | None | 15 | 88 | A | I | 15 | 92 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 33 | Resolved | None | 25 | 100 | A | I | 45 | 88 | B | II | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 34 | Improved | None | 30 | 92 | A | I | 15 | 100 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 35 | Resolved | None | 5 | 96 | A | I | 30 | 88 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 36 | Resolved | None | 40 | 96 | B | II | 40 | 96 | B | II | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 37 | Improved | None | 5 | 100 | A | I | 5 | 96 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 38 | Resolved | None | 50 | 84 | B | II | 55 | 88 | C | III | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 39 | Worsened | None | 10 | 100 | A | I | 10 | 100 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 40 | Resolved | None | 60 | 36 | C | III | 55 | 64 | C | III | 1/6 | 1/6 |
| 41 | Improved | None | 20 | 96 | A | I | 10 | 92 | A | I | 1/6 | 1/6 |
Table 5
Operative details
| Operative time | |
|---|---|
| Mean | 114.0 min |
| Range | 87–157 min |
| Estimated blood loss | |
| Mean | 22.3 mL |
| Range | 5–50 mL |
| Length of hospital stay (d) | |
| 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 19 |
| 4 | 12 |
| 5 | 6 |
| 6 | 1 |
| 7 | 1 |
| Mean | 3.7 |
The mean operative time for the fully endoscopic procedure was 114.0 minutes with a range of 87 to 157 minutes. Estimated blood loss was minimal in the majority of cases, averaging 22.3 mL and ranging from 5 to 50 mL. The average length of hospital stay was 3.7 days, ranging from 2 to 7 days. A majority of these patients remained hospitalized due to transiently worsened vertiginous symptoms after surgery; however, all demonstrated rapid vestibular compensation over the first few postoperative days. Three patients (7.3%) suffered postoperative complications; however, two of these were minor complications: a CSF leak that was treated and resolved with a lumbar drain and a superficial wound infection that was treated with oral antibiotics. One patient (2.4%), however, re-presented with an intracranial abscess adjacent to the surgical site. This patient underwent a craniotomy for evacuation of the abscess and long-term antibiotic care with a full recovery to baseline neurological function. Zero patients suffered from postoperative CN palsies other than hearing loss.
Discussion
Meniere disease is a chronic ear disorder that creates intermittent vertiginous symptoms in middle-aged adults.1 2 3 4 5 Medical therapy remains the first-line treatment for this disorder, with nondestructive procedures such as endolymphatic sac surgery and intratympanic steroids providing effective second-line modalities.6 7 While these treatments have proven to be highly effective in Meniere disease, some patients have symptoms that remain refractory. It is these select patients that are candidates for ablative techniques such as intratympanic gentamycin and VNS, which preserve hearing, or labyrinthectomy, a hearing sacrificial procedure.
McKenzie and Dandy first introduced the VNS procedure through a suboccipital approach in the 1930s,28 however, this technique fell out of favor when House detailed performing VNS via a middle cranial fossa technique.29 A high rate of facial nerve paralysis and hearing loss,1 2 12 30 however, led to the development of VNS via the retrolabyrinthine approach. A high rate of CSF leaks, however, popularized the retrosigmoid approach for VNS.15
Traditionally, CPA surgery is done almost exclusively via traditional open surgery utilizing the operative microscope for visualization. This technique, however, has several limitations in posterolateral skull base surgery. The linear light source of the operative microscope, located outside of the surgical field, creates significant difficulty for surgeons trying to optimally visualize the various and essential neurovascular structures of the CPA. As a result, skull base surgeons are forced to compensate for this shortcoming by creating larger cranial openings, requiring more soft tissue dissection, along with some degree of cerebellar retraction which can cause significant postoperative ataxia and morbidity. In addition, even with these compromises, visualization of structures ventral to pathology remains difficult. This can be especially hazardous for facial nerve preservation as CN VII sits ventrally to CN VIII, often the location of CPA pathology.
In the 1990s, several authors began studying the role of endoscopy in the CPA. Many reported improved visualization of the CPA neurovasculature via the surgical endoscope in comparison to the operative microscope.16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Miyazaki et al first introduced the endoscope to the VNS procedure in 2005 when he reported his endoscopic-assisted technique with good results and a low complication rate.24
Recently, the fully endoscopic approach to CPA pathology has begun to be reported. This technique is performed with the endoscope alone; the operative microscope is not used at any point. Several authors have published success in performing microvascular decompressions in the CPA with the fully endoscopic technique.31 32 33 34 35 In addition, CPA tumors, such as vestibular schwannomas, meningiomas, and epidermoid cysts, have also been successfully resected via the fully endoscopic technique, without the operative microscope.36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
In 2012, Culter et al described a technique of fully endoscopic VNS in a series of 11 patients.25 To our knowledge, this was the first fully endoscopic VNS report, however, the operative microscope was brought in for 5 of the 11 patients in this study. Nonetheless, 10 out of the 11 patients (91%) had improvement in vertiginous symptoms at follow-up with 1 patient (9%) suffering from a facial nerve palsy, HB 3/6, after surgery.
Our results are similar and, in some cases, more successful than the current reports of the traditional open VNS in the literature. A total of 38 of the 41 patients (93%) in our study demonstrated either complete resolution or improvement in vertigo symptoms at follow-up. In addition, all 41 patients (100%) retained full facial nerve function. While 7 of 41 patients (17%) had decreased hearing results after surgery, only two patients (4.8%) went from preoperative "serviceable" hearing to postoperative "nonservicable" hearing. Our complication rate was low with only one CSF leak (2.4%), which was treated and resolved with a lumbar drain, and two infections (4.8%), one of which was superficial and did not require surgical intervention.
In our experience, the surgical endoscope provides improved visualization of CPA neurovasculature and pathology. As a result, we perform all VNS procedures in a fully endoscopic fashion as this technique allows us to visualize the location of CN VII, ventral to CN VIII, and its relationship to the vestibular nerve. After obtaining this information, we can proceed with the VNS with more confidence in facial nerve will note be damaged, something that has not happened to date. In addition, the improved visualization with the endoscope allows for the complete elimination of cerebellar retraction, reduces craniotomy size, and lessens the amount of soft tissue dissection, thereby decreasing potential morbidity.
The fully endoscopic technique, however, does not come without limitations. First, surgeons must have experience and comfort with the endoscope and pneumatic holding arm as inadvertent movement could have catastrophic results in CPA due to the valuable nature of the surrounding structures. We recommend cadaveric training in this technique before implementation into practice. In addition, traditional bayonet-style surgical instruments are difficult to use in such a small, long operative corridor. As a result, we recommend converting to instrumentation based on a rotational pistol-grip style. Finally, preoperative imaging must be carefully studied to ensure that the surgeon will have an adequate amount of CSF to release, without which an inappropriately small operative corridor will exist between the cerebellar hemisphere and adjacent petrous bone, rendering the approach impossible.
Conclusion
Fully endoscopic VNS is a safe and highly effective treatment modality for medically refractory Meniere disease. This procedure provides surgeons improved visualization of CPA neurovasculature while reducing soft tissue dissection, craniotomy size, and completely eliminating cerebellar retraction. While clinical results have been demonstrated to be positive, future studies involving a larger patient volume would be beneficial. In addition, we encourage skull base surgeons to become increasingly versed in utilizing endoscopy to treat CPA pathology.
References
1. Perez R Ducati A Garbossa D et al. Retrosigmoid approach for vestibular neurectomy in Meniere's disease Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005147 4401–404., discussion 404 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. De la Cruz A, Teufert K B, Berliner K I. Surgical treatment for vertigo: patient survey of vertigo, imbalance, and time course for recovery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135(4):541–548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Crane B T, Minor L B, Della Santina C C, Carey J P. Middle ear exploration in patients with Ménière's disease who have failed outpatient intratympanic gentamicin therapy. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30(5):619–624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Rauch S D. Clinical hints and precipitating factors in patients suffering from Meniere's disease. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2010;43(5):1011–1017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Neff B A, Staab J P, Eggers S D. et al. Auditory and vestibular symptoms and chronic subjective dizziness in patients with Ménière's disease, vestibular migraine, and Ménière's disease with concomitant vestibular migraine. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33(7):1235–1244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Sennaroglu L, Sennaroglu G, Gursel B, Dini F M. Intratympanic dexamethasone, intratympanic gentamicin, and endolymphatic sac surgery for intractable vertigo in Meniere's disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;125(5):537–543. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Sajjadi H, Paparella M M. Meniere's disease. Lancet. 2008;372(9636):406–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Graham M D, Goldsmith M M. Labyrinthectomy. Indications and surgical technique. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1994;27(2):325–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Kemink J L, Telian S A, el-Kashlan H, Langman A W. Retrolabyrinthine vestibular nerve section: efficacy in disorders other than Menière's disease. Laryngoscope. 1991;101(5):523–528. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Fucci M J, Sataloff R T, Myers D L. Vestibular nerve section. Am J Otolaryngol. 1994;15(3):180–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Brookes G B The role of vestibular nerve section in Menière's disease Ear Nose Throat J 199776 9652–656., 658–659, 663 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Pappas D G Jr, Pappas D G Sr. Vestibular nerve section: long-term follow-up. Laryngoscope. 1997;107(9):1203–1209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Tewary A K, Riley N, Kerr A G. Long-term results of vestibular nerve section. J Laryngol Otol. 1998;112(12):1150–1153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Thomsen J, Berner B, Tos M. Vestibular neurectomy. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2000;27(4):297–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Silverstein H, Jackson L E. Vestibular nerve section. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2002;35(3):655–673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. O'Donoghue G M, O'Flynn P. Endoscopic anatomy of the cerebellopontine angle. Am J Otol. 1993;14(2):122–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Magnan J, Chays A, Lepetre C, Pencroffi E, Locatelli P. Surgical perspectives of endoscopy of the cerebellopontine angle. Am J Otol. 1994;15(3):366–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Magnan J, Chays A, Cohen J M, Caces F, Locatelli P. Endoscopy of the cerebellopontine angle. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 1995;116(2):115–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Cappabianca P, Cavallo L M, Esposito F, de Divitiis E, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic examination of the cerebellar pontine angle. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2002;104(4):387–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Wackym P A, King W A, Meyer G A, Poe D S. Endoscopy in neuro-otologic surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2002;35(2):297–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Borucki L, Szyfter W, Leszczyńska M. Microscopy and endoscopy of the cerebellopontine angle in the retrosigmoid approach [in Polish] Otolaryngol Pol. 2004;58(3):509–515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Van Rompaey J, Bush C, McKinnon B, Solares A C. Minimally invasive access to the posterior cranial fossa: an anatomical study comparing a retrosigmoidal endoscopic approach to a microscopic approach. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2013;74(1):1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Takemura Y, Inoue T, Morishita T, Rhoton A L Jr. Comparison of microscopic and endoscopic approaches to the cerebellopontine angle. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(3–4):427–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Miyazaki H, Deveze A, Magnan J. Neuro-otologic surgery through minimally invasive retrosigmoid approach: endoscope assisted microvascular decompression, vestibular neurotomy, and tumor removal. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(9):1612–1617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Cutler A R, Kaloostian S W, Ishiyama A, Frazee J G. Two-handed endoscopic-directed vestibular nerve sectioning: case series and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2012;117(3):507–513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery . Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, INC. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;113(3):179–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Gardner G, Robertson J H. Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1988;97(1):55–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Li C S Lai J T Evaluation of retrosigmoid vestibular neurectomy for intractable vertigo in Ménière's disease: an interdisciplinary review Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008150 7655–661., discussion 661 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. House W F. Surgical exposure of the internal auditory canal and its contents through the middle, cranial fossa. Laryngoscope. 1961;71:1363–1385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Nguyen C D, Brackmann D E, Crane R T, Linthicum F H Jr, Hitselberger W E. Retrolabyrinthine vestibular nerve section: evaluation of technical modification in 143 cases. Am J Otol. 1992;13(4):328–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Jarrahy R, Eby J B, Cha S T, Shahinian H K. Fully endoscopic vascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2002;45(1):32–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Kabil M S, Eby J B, Shahinian H K. Endoscopic vascular decompression versus microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2005;48(4):207–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Yadav Y R, Parihar V, Agarwal M, Sherekar S, Bhatele P. Endoscopic vascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2011;54(3):110–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Halpern C H, Lang S S, Lee J Y. Fully endoscopic microvascular decompression: our early experience. Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:739432. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Setty P, Volkov A A, D'Andrea K P, Pieper D R. Endoscopic vascular decompression for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: clinical outcomes and technical note. World Neurosurg. 2014;81(3–4):603–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Goksu N, Bayazit Y, Kemaloglu Y. Endoscopy of the posterior fossa and endoscopic dissection of acoustic neuroma. Neurosurg Focus. 1999;6(4):e15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Tan C, Brookes G B. The endoscopic technique utilized in removal process of acoustic neuroma by retrosigmoid approach [in Chinese] Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2003;17(1):25–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Schroeder H WS, Oertel J, Gaab M R. Endoscope-assisted microsurgical resection of epidermoid tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. J Neurosurg. 2004;101(2):227–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Shahinian H K, Eby J B, Ocon M. Fully endoscopic excision of vestibular schwannomas. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2004;47(6):329–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Yuguang L, Chengyuan W, Meng L. et al. Neuroendoscopic anatomy and surgery of the cerebellopontine angle. J Clin Neurosci. 2005;12(3):256–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. de Divitiis O Cavallo L M Dal Fabbro M Elefante A Cappabianca P Freehand dynamic endoscopic resection of an epidermoid tumor of the cerebellopontine angle: technical case report Neurosurgery 200761 502E239–E240., discussion E240 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Lü J, Wu H, Huang Q, Yang J, Li Y. Application of the endoscope assisting in retrosigmoid approach vestibular schwannoma resection [in Chinese] Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;23(1):1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Shahinian H K, Ra Y. 527 fully endoscopic resections of vestibular schwannomas. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2011;54(2):61–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Pieper D R. The endoscopic approach to vestibular schwannomas and posterolateral skull base pathology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012;45(2):439–454, x. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Krass J, Hahn Y, Karami K, Babu S, Pieper D R. Endoscopic assisted resection of prepontine epidermoid cysts. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2014;75(2):120–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Journal of Neurological Surgery. Part B, Skull Base are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949056/
0 Response to "Should Diuretics Be Continued After Vestibular Nerve Section"
Post a Comment